The Russian government indicated its increasing intolerance toward nationalist organizations today with the Moscow City Court ruling that the Movement Against Illegal Immigration (DPNI) is an extremist organization. The verdict fulfilled of a request by Moscow city prosecutors and Prosecutors General Office to investigate the organization for inciting racial violence. “In the course of the investigation” a statement from the General Prosecutor’s office reads, “it was proved that the purpose and the activities of the organization is directed to carrying out extremist activities which incite the violation of people’s and citizens’ rights and freedoms, causes injury to individuals, the health of citizens, society, and the state.” The Moscow prosecutor’s office didn’t mince words in saying that the DPNI “mirrored the ideology of Nazi skinheads.” Yup, that sounds about right. This should have been said a long time ago, but better late than never.
Recent activities of DPNI members gave the court the ammunition to do so. In January, a group of DPNI members were tried for beating and killing immigrants in the Moscow suburb of Protivno. Ilya Boidakov, the leader of Protivno DPNI, pleaded guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence of five years in the slammer. The remaning members await sentencing. In December 2010, Ivan Mikheev, DPNI’s local leader in Kirov, was convicted along with two others to probation under Article 282: “inciting hatred, emnity, and humiliation of human dignity, and the public support for terrorism.” And lastly, Nina Zenkova, a DPNI activist in Tula, was convicted of distributing extremist literature and inciting hatred. And who could forget that DPNI’s leader Alexander Belov was jailed for six months in 2009 under Article 282.
What really brought DPNI under the state’s microscope, however, was the Manezh riots four months ago. After the riots President Medvedev sent a clear signal that the state’s tolerance of nationalist groups was waning with “Acts aimed at inciting racial, national or religious hatred…threaten the stability of the state.” To which Putin added, “It is necessary to crack down on any extremist acts.” A steady crackdown has commenced culminating in with DPNI, the largest nationalist organization thus far to feel the state’s wrath.
The ruling was hailed by government agencies and human rights groups alike. However, the hate group monitor SOVA, while welcoming the ban, argued that it won’t change much in the end. “DPNI activists who attack immigrants with continue without leading organ,” says Alexander Verkhovskii.
DPNI plans to appeal the ruling, but it will come to nothing. With the General Prosecutor’s weight behind this, you can be sure DPNI doesn’t have a chance.
But as SOVA attests, legal prohibition might be more symbolic than anything. Indeed, DPNI’s leadership vows to find “a new format” for its activities. According to DPNI’s leader Vladimir Ermolaev, DPNI has already set up a number of autonomous initiatives and clubs–”Russian People,” “National Interest,” and even a human rights group called “Russian power.” The task of these groups, in his words, “are to create something new, progressive, and interesting. We want to continue working and benefit society.”
You gotta love it when racists adopt human rights speak.
Image: RIA Novosti





{ 11 comments }
Banning these organizations is a pointless gesture. They will simply reproliferate under new names. It is far more effective to let them be, with a few police spies in their ranks.
The timing of this ban is also interesting: as soon as the DPNI seemed to be moving from simply organizing brawls with non-Russians to seriously considering organizing a political party that could compete in the upcoming Duma elections, the authorities suddenly seemed far more interested in cracking down on the group.
A good post. But I guess it’s Protvino, not Protivno.
The problem is, that on purely legal basis it’s impossible to distinguish racists from liberal democrats. Just open the doors — and racists will come in.
You need to have some state-adopted ideology, which will be also accepted in the society. But both the 1990s and the 1940s were disastrous, so…
On a more personal note, what do you think about the recent Vladimir Kara-Murza Jr.’s take on Russian Communists?
http://tinyurl.com/3bjjmbl
That guy is the N1 Russia-related blogger in the recent La Russophobe’s list
.
In this case, I think Kara-Muza is mostly right about Zyuganov, though what he thinks about Stalin and Hussein is pretty politically irrelevant. Judging from all the Stalin posters I saw at last year’s May Day, he’s just speaking to his constituency.
Frankly, I don’t think the KPRF will go anywhere as long as Zyuganov is at the helm. They need younger blood and Zyuganov is stuck in the 20th century. From what I understand, the KPRF does have a growing core of young activists in the provinces so maybe the future is bright. Btw has it been confirmed that the KPRF was behind the Medvedev-Putin spoof election video? That’s the kind of political technology they need. http://bit.ly/h6ZQkc
The concept of the “loyal opposition” is just stupid. I would like Kara-Murza to name a parliamentary system where the opposition isn’t loyal to the system they are a part of. Kara-Muza and the liberals like him want the KPRF to commit political suicide and fundamentally oppose Putin. At least Zyuganov is smart enough to stay within the bounds the government and the electorate have placed on Russian politics.
I believe I’ve seen that video. No matter who was behind it, the message is pro-KPRF…
And I do agree with your assessment of Zyuganov. With Zyuganov, KPRF is a party of people who long for the “good old days”. Doesn’t really help to attract the young.
The “democratic opposition” types complains about the lack of free and fair elections, but they are not going to win any. A gathering of cheaters. However, if the “Right Cause” wins a place in the parliament, more radical factions may become a history.
On a different more personal note, I’ve just thought you one of the few people in the United States who can really understand and appreciate the following music piece:
http://argonov.ru/2032.html
It’s a sort of alternative history about the Soviet Union in 2032. Not pro-communist, although it makes an extensive use of the Communist ideas and ideology. Also, the Russian “SkyNet” is positively charming.
I agree with Anatoly that announcing a ban is likely to be largely ineffective on its own. But it’s a necessary and politically astute move for western consumption, and to reassure Russians that the government is taking action. There’s no reason infiltration of nationalist groups cannot continue to be a prime contributor to their breakup, but such tactics don’t make for good PR; attributing a success to infiltration only makes xenophobic groups more suspicious and cautious of their membership.
Adoption of the “victim” mantle by such groups merely suggests they are adopting a more cosmopolitan approach to conducting themselves, as they have seen plenty of examples that such initiatives enjoy sufficient success in more open societies to make the effort worthwhile. I can’t see it working in Russia, especially after Manezh.
I think pretty much everyone understands that banning the DPNI isn’t an end all. Though I wouldn’t relegate it to mere PR. It’s that, but it is also depriving one of the largest and well organized extreme nationalist group the ability to use their symbols, organize, etc. Moreover, it’s not the ban, but the legal ramifications. It gives the state a means to throw them in jail just for using the symbols. Sure DPNI will just reform in some other fashion, but I think the signal is important. Also it comes in the wake of the state declaring a few other nationalist groups extremist.
Infiltration works if the history of the FBI’s war against the Black Panther Party shows. Fomenting suspicion and paranoia is exactly how their were destroyed from within.
Yes, I’m for infiltration, it has had excellent successes in the past and the Black Panther movement is a very good example. Forcing such movements to take care with their recruiting probably helps a good deal in keeping them small and secretive.
But I didn’t think about the law de-legitimizing all their symbology and forcing their recruiting underground. That’s a good point.
Comments on this entry are closed.
{ 1 trackback }