Russian Unionists and Activists Attacked

By Sean at 17 November, 2008, 11:29 am

As American automakers prepare to lobby the US government for their share of the $700 billion rescue corporate redistribution fund, GM, who is heading the effort, opened a new $300 million factory in Russia “to compensate for slumping sales in western Europe and North America.”  Carl-Peter Forster, the head of GM in Europe, predicts that the plant, which will employ 981 people, may increase to 1,700 next year.  Such predictions come as autoworkers in the US wonder what will happen to their jobs and pensions if America’s Big Three aren’t deemed to big to save.  Once again the transfer of labor from one country to another should be a reminder of the real face of globalization: to drive down wages and increase corporate profits.

Russia looks to be a perfect place.  It has a skilled labor force and a weak union movement.  It is not only that, in the words of Forster and that “Russia emerged [as a market] long ago.” It is also that international capital can get away with things that it can’t as easily in the United States and Western Europe, i.e. violently attack and threaten union and other social activists activists. I wonder is this is what Medvedev had in mind when he ordered police to be ready to quell any signs of social unrest connected with the economic crisis.

Well the use of violence is exactly what happened to Alexei Etmanov, the chair of the union at the Ford-Vsevolozhsk plant on 8 November.  According to Chto delat,

[Etmanov] parked his car in a lot and headed for his house. On Heroes Street three men jumped in his path and without uttering a word attacked Alexei. They were armed with knuckledusters.

During the tussle, Alexei managed to pull a stun gun from his pocket and get off a shot. The cloak-and-dagger types beat a hot retreat.

The next day his deputy Vladimir Lesik got a phone call warning that the attack wouldn’t be the last. The assailants kept their word.  Etmanov was attacked again by an unknown man wielding a metal pipe on 13 November. Etmanov escape again by firing rubber bullets at the assailant.

This of course is neither the first or the last attack on Russian union activists.  As Chto delat reminds us,

Over the past two years such attacks have happened more than once: labor activists have been savagely beaten in Kaliningrad, Togliatti, and Taganrog. Each time the targets were union activists who challenged the complete sway of their employers and thus all employers who recognize no one’s rights other than their own sovereign right to dictate the work conditions and the lives of “their” workers.

Each time the reprisals followed a heightening of conflict at the respective factories. Despite the fact that police investigators have still not managed to solve any of these crimes, there can hardly be any doubt as to the names of the people who really commissioned them since it is much too obvious whose interests were threatened.

The recent attacks on Etmanov have been followed by several other attacks on Russian social activists.  On 13 November, Sergei Fedotov, the leader of Deceived Land Shareholders, was attacked in the village of Mikhalevo.  Two young men beat Fedotov with baseball bats as he exited his car.  That same day, Mikhail Beketov, a editor-in-chief for Khimkinskaya pravda was beaten half to death.  Beketov has been an outspoken opponent of efforts to prevent the clearing of the Khimki Forest. Finally, since three is the magic number, French sociologist and activist Carine Clement was assaulted in Moscow after she participated in a round table discussion at Bilingua Club.  According to her, two men ran up to her and stabbed her with a syringe containing an unknown substance.  This was the third attack on Clement this month.  She was beaten and mugged two weeks ago near her Moscow home. The second occurred on 12 November when she was verbally assaulted and spat upon by an unknown assailant.  Clement is the director of the Institute of Collective Action in Moscow which fights for housing and labor rights.

Is this part of a growing trend?  Merely the sign of the times?

A statement (translated by Chto delat) from Collective Action in response to the series of attacks explains them as follows:

Recently, criminal attacks against the leaders of trade union and social movements have clearly increased. Among the latest such incidents, we should note the attacks against Carine Clément, a member of the working group and a leader of the Union of Coordinating Councils; Alexei Etmanov, leader of the labor union at Ford-Vsevolozhsk; Mikhail Beketov, leader of the movement to defend the Khimki Forest; and Sergei Fedotov, leader of the deceived land shareholders of the Moscow Region. In addition, a great many activists fighting the infill construction that is happening in all our cities have been attacked. There have been murders, in particular, of antifascist activists.

This is not a random phenomenon, but a clear trend: active citizens who try to restore justice and defend their legal rights are more and more often subjected to brute force. With no other arguments at its disposal, the opposite resorts to criminal methods. While it is clear that in each situation it is a different group of people who commissions these crimes, the overall tendency demonstrates that excellent conditions for the further escalation of this brutal method of “social dialogue” have been created in Russia today. These conditions include lawlessness, the lack of criminal liability for violations of the law by state officials or members of the ruling elite, universal corruption, and the hypercentralization of authority in the absence of any form of control from below. Many cases of “political” attacks on activists have still not been investigated, and the guilty parties not be found, which gives the assailants a sense of impunity and thus provokes further crimes.

We say, Enough!

We demand a maximally thorough and swift investigation of all assaults against all social activists, the transfer of these cases into a separate category, and the creation of a special investigative group within the Ministry of the Interior. We also demand that the public be kept informed about the course of these investigations.

We demand that the assailants be punished according to law whatever high-ranking patrons might support them.

We declare that we will not be intimidated by the method of violence and terror. We will continue our struggle for the social rights of our country’s citizens.

We appeal to the state authorities, who position themselves as the guarantee of “public order,” to make sure that “public order” is not violated by government officials. As it is, all we observe now is the arrests of old women and young activists at various assemblies, demonstrations or strikes, while we hear very little about arrests of corrupt state officials or unscrupulous employers. Down with this politics of double standards!

We declare that, given the situation, we consider it our right to use methods of self-defense and that we will use all possible means to assist and protect our comrades.

Popularity: 3% [?]

Categories : Capitalism | Labor | Leftism | Resistance

Comments
Buster November 17, 2008

Just more proof that Dima has been reading up on his Lenin, even if he’s turning descriptive invective into prescriptive corrective:

There is not a single state, however democratic, which has no loopholes or reservations in its constitution guaranteeing the bourgeoisie the possibility of dispatching troops against the workers, of proclaiming martial law, and so forth, in case of a “violation of public order,” and actually in case the exploited class “violates” its position of slavery and tries to behave in a non-slavish manner. Kautsky shamelessly embellishes bourgeois democracy and omits to mention, for instance, how the most democratic and republican bourgeoisie in America or Switzerland deal with workers on strike.

Alas dear Kautsky, remembered only as a whipping boy. One of my students once wrote about Mr. Renegade Kautsky, as though pejorative were his first name.

Tim Newman November 18, 2008

Once again the transfer of labor from one country to another should be a reminder of the real face of globalization: to drive down wages and increase corporate profits.

Translation: how dare horrible foreigners do the job that only Americans should be allowed to do, and paid a premium for doing!!

Tim Newman November 18, 2008

It has a skilled labor force and a weak union movement.

I keep hearing that Russia has a skilled labour force. Does anyone with any experience managing a Russian labour force say this, or is it just navel-gazing academics and political hopefuls?

In my experience, having worked on the largest project ever attempted in Russia, I’d generalise that 10% of Russians are brilliant workers, 30% are okay, 60% are bloody useless, quality control and safety are imports as foreign as Toyotas and Louis Vuitton handbags, and huge swathes of the Russian labour force actually engaged in labour instead of manning beauracracies are from Central Asia or China.

W. Shedd November 18, 2008

I keep hearing that Russia has a skilled labour force.

Adding to what Newman wrote: Despite whatever skills the Russian labour force may or may not have, there is not a great Russian work ethic.

You’ll find exceptions to this, of course, but the masses are generally not people who believe in working hard to make a living. Part of Russian culture seems to be finding an angle or an out or a loop-hole.

Dmitry Medvedev November 18, 2008

You’ll find exceptions to this, of course, but the masses are generally not people who believe in working hard to make a living. Part of Russian culture seems to be finding an angle or an out or a loop-hole.
————————————————–
How unfair! Who then built the country? Who sent the first man to the space? Who won the war against Georgia that invaded S. Ossetia? Who is pumping oil so that you could drive your cars (don’t tell me Tim Newman does)?

Kolya November 18, 2008

“Part of Russian culture seems to be finding an angle or an out or a loop-hole.”

Years ago I was walking down a Moscow street with an American businessman after a frustrating meeting with a group of Russians. The American had already lived in Russia for several years and spoke the language well. As we were talking about the meeting, he told me: “It’s so ingrained for people here to work around the system that too many times they cannot see that the quickest way to get from point A to point B is often a straight line.”

(It’s not an exact quote, but that’s the gist of it. I laughed at his words and later in the day I wrote them down. I have them in box of papers somewhere.)

Aurelius November 18, 2008

I read on an internet news service yesterday:
Manager of construction company in Moscow is made redundant.She is asked to sign a document which states that she has resigned “voluntarily”.She objects.A question is then put to her:”Do you want to bury your children”.[No more objections]

Tim Newman November 19, 2008

I read on an internet news service yesterday:
Manager of construction company in Moscow is made redundant.She is asked to sign a document which states that she has resigned “voluntarily”.She objects.A question is then put to her:”Do you want to bury your children”.[No more objections]

Must be “international capital” behind the threats. Snigger.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.