<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recommended Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/</link>
	<description>Russia Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chrisius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55906</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrisius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55906</guid>
		<description>&quot;Russia, the United States, Canada, and Denmark are now in a renewed effort to claim possession over the the globe’s ice cap.&quot;

I knew the Danes and Canadians would never give up their imperialistic, plundering ways. Just ask the Inuit and Icelanders. Where are you, the Inuit Ed Lucas, to warn us against the historic injustices visited by Dread Canada against its peaceful Arctic neighbors?? Will the West slumber once again as Denmark and Canada continue their Drang nach Norden? Remember Munich!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Russia, the United States, Canada, and Denmark are now in a renewed effort to claim possession over the the globe’s ice cap.&#8221;</p>
<p>I knew the Danes and Canadians would never give up their imperialistic, plundering ways. Just ask the Inuit and Icelanders. Where are you, the Inuit Ed Lucas, to warn us against the historic injustices visited by Dread Canada against its peaceful Arctic neighbors?? Will the West slumber once again as Denmark and Canada continue their Drang nach Norden? Remember Munich!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da Russophile</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55849</link>
		<dc:creator>Da Russophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55849</guid>
		<description>One researcher has already even written a book on the economic impacts of global warming. 

http://www.hi.is/~tv/

Possibly equivalently important to the release of major new hydrocarbons reserves are the benefits for shipping. No longer iced over, trade between Europe and the Far East will increasingly use the North-East Passage. Russia will become a major transportation hub as well as energy superpower, at least until renewables really get noticeable. As such it is not surprising to read recent news, e.g. that Russia plans the long-term construct of 5-6 aircraft carrier groups (http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080404/103745057.html).

(In the even longer term the effects may be even more dramatic, as hundreds of millions of refugees from ecologically stricken countries to the South make their way up north.)

As for the Stalin discussion, I&#039;d say Saltykov is just one of the very many who were taken in by the allure of totalitarian kitsch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One researcher has already even written a book on the economic impacts of global warming. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hi.is/~tv/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hi.is/~tv/</a></p>
<p>Possibly equivalently important to the release of major new hydrocarbons reserves are the benefits for shipping. No longer iced over, trade between Europe and the Far East will increasingly use the North-East Passage. Russia will become a major transportation hub as well as energy superpower, at least until renewables really get noticeable. As such it is not surprising to read recent news, e.g. that Russia plans the long-term construct of 5-6 aircraft carrier groups (<a href="http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080404/103745057.html" rel="nofollow">http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080404/103745057.html</a>).</p>
<p>(In the even longer term the effects may be even more dramatic, as hundreds of millions of refugees from ecologically stricken countries to the South make their way up north.)</p>
<p>As for the Stalin discussion, I&#8217;d say Saltykov is just one of the very many who were taken in by the allure of totalitarian kitsch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kolya</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55822</link>
		<dc:creator>Kolya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55822</guid>
		<description>Just read Shoumatoff article. A very good read from a very good writer. Thanks, Sean! As someone who at times lived in the outdoors for months at a time , I enjoy reading those kind of stories. I guess it&#039;s inevitable, but it&#039;s still frustrating that when international political and economic interests clash scientific findings and theories become politicized.

I have not read anything by Shoumatoff in years. I&#039;m glad that thanks to Sean I rediscovered him. Years ago a dear friend gave me Shoumatoff&#039;s &quot;Russian Blood&quot; as a gift. Because of my own background I found it quite good, but don&#039;t know if others will find it interesting. He also wrote about Chico Mendes, the murdered Brazilian labor and enviromentalist organizer. I have never been to Africa (maybe some day!), but it was from Shoumatoff that years before the Rwandan genocide I first heard about Tutsis and Hutus--his wife is a Tutsi.

Tim mentioned Jared Diamond&#039;s &quot;Guns, Germs and Steel&quot;--a very good book indeed. In my &quot;to read&quot; pile is the book of another highly respected ecologist and population biologist, Peter Turchin&#039;s &quot;War and Peace and War: The Life Cycles of Imperial Nations&quot;. I heard good stuff about it. Peter Turchin is a Russian-born American. His father is Valentin Turchin, a scientist and former Soviet dissident. 

Here is the link for Peter Turchin&#039;s website:

http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/people/turchin/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read Shoumatoff article. A very good read from a very good writer. Thanks, Sean! As someone who at times lived in the outdoors for months at a time , I enjoy reading those kind of stories. I guess it&#8217;s inevitable, but it&#8217;s still frustrating that when international political and economic interests clash scientific findings and theories become politicized.</p>
<p>I have not read anything by Shoumatoff in years. I&#8217;m glad that thanks to Sean I rediscovered him. Years ago a dear friend gave me Shoumatoff&#8217;s &#8220;Russian Blood&#8221; as a gift. Because of my own background I found it quite good, but don&#8217;t know if others will find it interesting. He also wrote about Chico Mendes, the murdered Brazilian labor and enviromentalist organizer. I have never been to Africa (maybe some day!), but it was from Shoumatoff that years before the Rwandan genocide I first heard about Tutsis and Hutus&#8211;his wife is a Tutsi.</p>
<p>Tim mentioned Jared Diamond&#8217;s &#8220;Guns, Germs and Steel&#8221;&#8211;a very good book indeed. In my &#8220;to read&#8221; pile is the book of another highly respected ecologist and population biologist, Peter Turchin&#8217;s &#8220;War and Peace and War: The Life Cycles of Imperial Nations&#8221;. I heard good stuff about it. Peter Turchin is a Russian-born American. His father is Valentin Turchin, a scientist and former Soviet dissident. </p>
<p>Here is the link for Peter Turchin&#8217;s website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/people/turchin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/people/turchin/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schumaker</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55819</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schumaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55819</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to recommend another recent book, &quot;Tchaikovsky 19, a Diplomatic Life behind the Iron Curtain,&quot; by Robert Ober.  Bob served in the Soviet Union during the 1970&#039;s and 1980&#039;s, and he has many valuable observations to make about the Brezhnev-Gorbachev period, which, unfortunately are becoming more topical today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to recommend another recent book, &#8220;Tchaikovsky 19, a Diplomatic Life behind the Iron Curtain,&#8221; by Robert Ober.  Bob served in the Soviet Union during the 1970&#8217;s and 1980&#8217;s, and he has many valuable observations to make about the Brezhnev-Gorbachev period, which, unfortunately are becoming more topical today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55795</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55795</guid>
		<description>Jim, no I haven&#039;t read Figes&#039; book and the more reviews I read about it, the more I want to. I&#039;m sure Figes can take the criticism just fine.  The question is why you can&#039;t. Are you his publicist or something?

The letter in LRB is pointing out one mistake that Siegelbaum made.  It says nothing of his substantive criticisms of Figes.  Here is the letter from Alyona Kozlova.

&quot;Lewis Siegelbaum commends the Memorial Society for the ‘public deed’ of interviewing survivors of the Stalinist regime, but attacks Orlando Figes for ‘self-promotion’ in posting these interviews on his website (LRB, 10 April). The suggestion is that Figes merely used materials collected by Memorial. In fact, he initiated the project, organised the interviews and oversaw the collection of the family archives. He should be applauded for making these materials available on his website, so that schools and historical researchers may benefit from them in years to come.&quot;

She&#039;s right.  Figes &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be applauded for making these materials available online.  It&#039;s an invaluable resource. But this doesn&#039;t mean how he uses that material is free come criticism.  

Seigelbaum&#039;s &quot;attack&quot; on Figes&#039; &quot;self promotion&quot; was off base and notice I didn&#039;t quote that part. Authors promoting their books on personal websites is the wave of the future as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, no I haven&#8217;t read Figes&#8217; book and the more reviews I read about it, the more I want to. I&#8217;m sure Figes can take the criticism just fine.  The question is why you can&#8217;t. Are you his publicist or something?</p>
<p>The letter in LRB is pointing out one mistake that Siegelbaum made.  It says nothing of his substantive criticisms of Figes.  Here is the letter from Alyona Kozlova.</p>
<p>&#8220;Lewis Siegelbaum commends the Memorial Society for the ‘public deed’ of interviewing survivors of the Stalinist regime, but attacks Orlando Figes for ‘self-promotion’ in posting these interviews on his website (LRB, 10 April). The suggestion is that Figes merely used materials collected by Memorial. In fact, he initiated the project, organised the interviews and oversaw the collection of the family archives. He should be applauded for making these materials available on his website, so that schools and historical researchers may benefit from them in years to come.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s right.  Figes <i>should</i> be applauded for making these materials available online.  It&#8217;s an invaluable resource. But this doesn&#8217;t mean how he uses that material is free come criticism.  </p>
<p>Seigelbaum&#8217;s &#8220;attack&#8221; on Figes&#8217; &#8220;self promotion&#8221; was off base and notice I didn&#8217;t quote that part. Authors promoting their books on personal websites is the wave of the future as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McCellan</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McCellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55768</guid>
		<description>Hey Sean, have you actually read The Whisperers? Doesn&#039;t sound like it, though you clearly like to post reviews by academics hostile to Figes. Siegelbaum&#039;s review is a gross distortion of Figes&#039;s analysis. By the way, in the latest issue of the LRB there is a letter of complaint from the Memorial Society, pointing out the distortions in Siegelbaum&#039;s review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sean, have you actually read The Whisperers? Doesn&#8217;t sound like it, though you clearly like to post reviews by academics hostile to Figes. Siegelbaum&#8217;s review is a gross distortion of Figes&#8217;s analysis. By the way, in the latest issue of the LRB there is a letter of complaint from the Memorial Society, pointing out the distortions in Siegelbaum&#8217;s review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Newman</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55724</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Trapping polar foxes was a big part of our traditional life, but in the last 10 or 15 years there have hardly been any. No one knows why.&lt;/em&gt;

Maybe the foxes have got smarter, having been caught and devoured at the same spot for the past century?

I used to think stories like this, especially ones with reference to languages dying out, were something to worry about until I read &lt;em&gt;Guns, Germs, and Steel&lt;/em&gt;, where I learned that this process of a stronger group either displacing or completely absorbing a weaker group has been going on for thousands of years.  There used to be thousands of peoples and languages in China, before the strongest one pretty much unified the country.  And the blacks who now dominate Africa were at one time restricted to only a few areas, with the other parts being populated by people quite different, speaking languages which no longer exist.  The people of Yakutia are just another at the end of an extremely long list, and there is nothing unusual about today&#039;s modern culture which is encroaching on them in historical terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Trapping polar foxes was a big part of our traditional life, but in the last 10 or 15 years there have hardly been any. No one knows why.</em></p>
<p>Maybe the foxes have got smarter, having been caught and devoured at the same spot for the past century?</p>
<p>I used to think stories like this, especially ones with reference to languages dying out, were something to worry about until I read <em>Guns, Germs, and Steel</em>, where I learned that this process of a stronger group either displacing or completely absorbing a weaker group has been going on for thousands of years.  There used to be thousands of peoples and languages in China, before the strongest one pretty much unified the country.  And the blacks who now dominate Africa were at one time restricted to only a few areas, with the other parts being populated by people quite different, speaking languages which no longer exist.  The people of Yakutia are just another at the end of an extremely long list, and there is nothing unusual about today&#8217;s modern culture which is encroaching on them in historical terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55723</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55723</guid>
		<description>Well that video shows how much I know (or rather don&#039;t know.) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that video shows how much I know (or rather don&#8217;t know.) <img src='http://seansrussiablog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55720</link>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55720</guid>
		<description>Nope... Let&#039;s try this link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=0la6sV_P-kI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope&#8230; Let&#8217;s try this link: <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=0la6sV_P-kI" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=0la6sV_P-kI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster</title>
		<link>http://seansrussiablog.org/2008/04/22/recommended-reading-3/comment-page-1/#comment-55719</link>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seansrussiablog.org/?p=602#comment-55719</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;victims of the double pronged assault of modernity&lt;/i&gt;???



(I hope that embed works.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>victims of the double pronged assault of modernity</i>???</p>
<p>(I hope that embed works.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
