On “s” Words and “i” Words

By Sean at 16 February, 2008, 10:07 am

Dmitri Medvedev’s speech to the Krasnoyarsk Economic Forum might be an indication of what he has in store for Russia. Before a crowd of Russian businessmen, Medvedev laid out his vision in a forty minute speech; a vision that when boiled down doesn’t look to rock the boat too much.

One of Medvedev’s themes revolved around the “s” word, svoboda, or freedom. “Freedom is better than non-freedom,” Medvedev declared, rather tritely. He then when on to emphasize that his view of freedom includes “personal freedom, economic freedom, and finally, freedom of expression.” How banal. Before anyone could get too excited with Medvedev’s liberal pretentions, he capped off his “freedom” rap with a Putinian maxim. “Freedom cannot be separated from the actual recognition of the power of law and to not chaos and respect the accepted order of the country.” Sounds like 2000 all over again.

At the moment, I take Medvedev’s “liberalism” as nothing more than campaign posturing. Sure, some might ask why he needs to placate the Russian business elite with a more liberal stance. Especially since his election is all but a forgone conclusion. The answer is that he’s not appealing to the Russian business elite’s liberal tendencies. They don’t really have any to appeal to. The last thing Russia’s chinovniki, er, businessmen want is anything akin to a populist notion of freedom. Medvedev’s statements are merely assurance that when in office he will continue along the present course. This is crystal clear when you put his “liberalism” alongside his statements about the law and the “accepted” order. In addition, Medvedev made it a point to refer to Putin six times. A move that I assume is to let the elite know that business will be as usual. Russia’s journey to 21st century modernization will be directed by the state and not against the fundamental interests of the Russian elite.

Here is where Medvedev’s plan of four “I”s come in: institutions, infrastructure, innovation, investment.

Within these four “I” Medvedev spelled out seven tasks: “overcoming legal nihilism, a radical reduction in administrative barriers, a reduction in taxes, the formation of a powerful and independent financial system, the modernization of infrastructure, the formation of the basis for a national system of innovation, and social development.” Notice there is no role for society in this effort. Like Russia’s many attempts at reform over the last three centuries, it is the state that will be its alpha and omega. Society’s seat at the table will be provisional, and at most advisory.

The truth of the matter is that Putin could have given this speech himself. And perhaps that is what is most comforting to the Russian business elite.

The same goes for voters. It doesn’t seem to matter whether it is Putin or Medvedev at the helm as long the former is there to watch over the store. According to a recent poll conducted by the Leveda-Center, 80 percent of Russians polled plan on voting for Medvedev. People’s expectations seem to be similar to what they were in 2000 and 2004 says Kommersant.

Some 51 percent expect him to secure the great-power status for Russia, and the rule of law and order in the country are the highlights for 45 percent. Some 41 percent would like Medvedev to ensure fair distribution of income, 34 percent expect social protection from him and 34 percent want him to step up the government’s share in economy.

Moreover, Medvedev’s supporters see him as “a continuation and a copy of Putin;” a fact that certainly is the origin of his widespread support. While no one is sure who power will be distributed between the two, polled Russians seem fine with the idea of a power dyad.

Some 41 percent of respondents think both leaders will be equal after March 2 election, 23 percent predict Putin to keep the authority, but 20 percent expect Medvedev to emerge as the leader. At the same time, 47 percent of the polled want Putin to remain Russia’s president, viewing election as something inevitable.

Something inevitable indeed. Two weeks from now the inevitable will arrive, and after a few days of hooting and hollering, things in Russia will go back to normal. That is assuming the Kremlin clans will acclimate themselves to the new (old) order.

Popularity: 7% [?]

Categories : Medvedev | Presidential Election | Putin | Putinism

Comments
ivanov February 16, 2008

Sean.
Do you expect Medevedev to say something new, strange or unusual?

I assumed he was appointed because he would not say something new, strange or unusual…

W. Shedd February 17, 2008

I think Putin and Medvedev do speak differently and address the future in different terms.

Fact is, Medvedev might be saying things which are “banal”, but he doesn’t seem likely to pop off at some reporter regarding Islamic terrorists: “If you want to completely become an Islamic radical and are ready to have a circumcision, then I invite you to Moscow. We have a multi-cultural country and have specialists even on this issue. And I will recommend him to perform this surgery in such a way so that nothing would grow out of you again.”

Or to make crude remarks about rape accusations, cynical remarks about being the only pure democrat, jokes about gay parades and “demographic problems” and outbursts like “мочить в сортире”.

Medvedev is a professional businessman/politician. Putin often behaves more like a truck-driver who found himself running the country. Most of the civilized world wouldn’t accept a political leader who speaks in such crude terms, but in Russia it marks him as a “real man”.

I wonder if Medvedev can sustain the good-boy image before he is going to need to say a few sharp-tongued, crude remarks of his own. In Russian politics, I think he’s going to be marked as a total p*ssy.

Chrisius Maximus February 17, 2008

“Most of the civilized world wouldn’t accept a political leader who speaks in such crude terms, but in Russia it marks him as a “real man”.”

Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran?

W. Shedd February 17, 2008

Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran?

Cite. When has Bush said he is going to bomb Iran? Good luck with that.

Even if he did, it is unlikely he adopted the sort of tone or language that I cited, that Putin routinely uses. It would be like Bush saying at a press conferences “We’re going to bomb those towel-heads back to the stone age.” Is discussion of military options to curtail Iran possibly developing nuclear weapons approaching the crudity of tone of making a joke about RAPE?!

My point was, Russian politicians are often rewarded by the Russian public for a crudity in tone and language that you might hear among truck drivers, rather than politicians. Medvedev has yet to use or adopt such language or tone in his speeches, appearances, and press conferences (at least any that I have read).

fh February 17, 2008

Re: “…bomb bomb Iran.”

It was McCain actually: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/McCain_unplugged_Bomb_bomb_bomb_bomb_0419.html

But it does seem to be true that, while Putin seems to position himself primarily for domestic audiences, Medvedev seems more outward-facing. Hard to know at this stage whether that’s of any importance.

Chrisius Maximus February 17, 2008

“Is discussion of military options to curtail Iran possibly developing nuclear weapons approaching the crudity of tone of making a joke about RAPE?!”

Can I imagine Bush making a joke about rape if he thought he was not being recorded? Sure can.

As fh mentioned, I was refering to McCain.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.