Speculation Nation
By Sean at 28 August, 2007, 7:29 pm
One day later and Russia and world have reacted to the arrest of 10 suspects in Anna Politkovskaya’s murder. Most of the Russian media have led with the story. The Kremlin funded English language Russia Today provided an overview of the story and the subsequent international reaction. The popular daily Komsomolskaya pravda hyped the fact that one of its correspondents originally spotted the killer, reporting that he “conducted himself like a agent or an operational worker from [Russian] security forces.” One of those arrested, Pavel Riaguzov, served in the central administration of the Moscow region FSB. According to statements given to the press by FSB General-Lieutenant Aleksandr Kupriazhkin, Riaduzov has long been suspected of having criminal ties. KP wondered whether Riagunov was indeed the person their correspondent spotted. Moskovskii Komsomolets also focused on the Riaguzov angle, and like KP, pointed to his connections to criminal elements. “The Chekist allegedly provided wiretaps and details of Politkovskaya’s conversations.” Riaguzov’s lawyers called the accusations “complete nonsense.” Nezavisimaya gazeta focused on the Western media’s obsession with the claim that the murder might be connected to Boris Berezovsky.
But not all the Russian media is so tame or sensible. Writing in the ever critical Ezhednevnyi zhurnal, Iuliya Latynina, in a bold headline “A Trotskyist-Berezovskii Operation,” searches for the conspiracy behind the conspiracy. And sadly Stalin’s historical footprint always seems to reveal itself on these occasions. She asks why the findings about Politkovskaya murder were revealed to the public at this moment. She gives three answers. First, simply, the “shit already had began to ooze,” and the revelation about the arrests to the public was inevitable. There was no way to hide the fact that those arrested–two former chekisty, some police officers, and Chechens bandits–was going to go unnoticed. If the government didn’t construct a preemptive narrative, it was likely the public would have made their own conclusion. And Latynina thinks that this conclusion would be unpleasant for the authorities. “For example, the public could decide that security agents . . could hardly take orders from enemies of the regime, which could keep all of their business under lock and key, but easily take orders from persons who keep their business quiet in case of failure. I personally think that this version is the most believable.” By her logic the first rule of politics is: control the message.
Second reason: the case will die in the courts. The “lack of evidence” and “pressure.” This, Latynina thinks is the most unlikely.
Third, the announcement of the arrests is a preview of a “big autumn Presidential fight.” Taken with the bombing of the Neva Express and the arrest of Tambov mafia boss Vladimir Kumarin, finding Politkovskaya’s killers falls into a political context that Latynina thinks will “end Putin’s road to retirement.”
So much for the Prosecutor office’s request that “reporters be more accurate with various kinds of information from unofficial sources and refrain from publishing the reports that may hinder investigation.”
Latynina’s comments remind me a bit like Freud’s death drive. Either people like her are so traumatized by living where the leader is eternal that they can’t imagine anything different even if they oppose said leader, or the desire for say Putin to leave office is so great it doubles back as a perverted desire that he will stay. Wouldn’t everything Latynina thinks about Russia be undermined if there is a peaceful transition of power through, albeit flawed, elections? After all, she might find more comfort in a verified ego rather than in one faced with the horrific notion that what it thinks no longer conforms to reality. Where would she be if the great Evil Putin wasn’t there to give her purpose?
Since everyone is speculating about the timing of the arrests, there is one coincidence that can’t be ignored. The arrests come a few days before Politkovskaya’s birthday. She would have turned 49 on August 30.
The truth of the matter, however, is that the arrests have revealed something far more disturbing than any grand conspiracy to manufacture a way for Putin to remain in office. As Novaya gazeta’s editorial board noted in a statement on the arrests, the investigation shows that elements in Russia’s security organs and the criminal underworld have cooperative ties. How high up this goes or whether they are rogue or connected to the Presidential administration is unknown. Either way such elements are likely to out last this and future administrations.
Popularity: 9% [?]
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
- Pingback by Global Voices Online » Russia: Politkovskaya Updates on August 30, 2007 @ 9:09 pm
- Pingback by Global Voices صداهای جهانیصداهای جهانی » Blog Archive » روسیه:قاتلان خبرنگار on August 31, 2007 @ 11:26 am
Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Wouldn’t everything Latynina thinks about Russia be undermined if there is a peaceful transition of power through, albeit flawed, elections?
Yes, in fact, I can’t think of any path to a Putin 3rd continuous term that wouldn’t completely discredit him. I suppose this is what his opponents might most desperately be wishing for, even as they predict it.
As Novaya gazeta’s editorial board noted in a statement on the arrests, the investigation shows that elements in Russia’s security organs and the criminal underworld have cooperative ties.
I had thought the rumor always was, if you have a successful business in Russia, at some point you have to decide if you are under the protection of the FSB or the Russian Mafia. “Whose roof are you under”, I believe that is how it is phrased. Hardly seems anymore surprising than the CIA and Mafia working together in the 1960s. All are have covert operations by their nature. Birds of a feather …
“Wouldn’t everything Latynina thinks about Russia be undermined if there is a peaceful transition of power through, albeit flawed, elections?”
Bingo!
Her writings have more the air of a psychological defense mechanism gone out of control than anything else.
“I had thought the rumor always was, if you have a successful business in Russia, at some point you have to decide if you are under the protection of the FSB or the Russian Mafia.”
****
Remember The Russia Journal at its zenith? How it quickly crumbled.
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@822.7uKzd0lCADV@.77480649/6984
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@822.7uKzd0lCADV@.77480649/6865
For clarity sake: AG was the principle of TRJ during its prime.
Latynina is an idiot. She believes the only purpose of toll roads is to control traffic, and thinks renting a few million acres of forest in the Tyumen area to the Chinese is the start of China taking over Russia.
RM:
What was pathetic about that last one was how she used that issue to attack the Russian government from a patriotic view.
Much like Ekho Moskvy employing Prokhonov and having Anna Arutunyan go up against Yevgenia Albats.
For clarity’s sake – the people I always heard the FSB or Mafia story from were Russians (my wife included). It has an urban legend sort of feel about it, but still I would always hear that when you have a successful business, eventually you are approached and have to make that choice.
That is one of the reasons why my father-in-law has never moved his dentistry practice to Moscow. He runs a very respectable and modern dental practice, but even at that he has a tough enough time avoiding being put under the thumb of local bureaucrats.
Myth or not, I didn’t get this “roof” idea from Western newspapers or magazines. And corruption of this kind may be rapidly becoming a thing of the past. But I know many Russians just widely accept it as fact, true or not.
“Latynina is an idiot. She believes the only purpose of toll roads is to control traffic, and thinks renting a few million acres of forest in the Tyumen area to the Chinese is the start of China taking over Russia.”
That’s part of the extreme Westernizer schtick. The East is Bad; the West is Good.
The Prokhonov reference having to do with Putin getting critiqued from a right view, which skirts the line of many on the mainstream Russian patriotic side. As entertaining as some found it, the Arutunyan-Albats exchange saw the neocon to neolib Albats going up against someone who can’t be considered as being as clear a political opposite of Albats, relative to other available options.
Like the Chinese have taken over southern California. The Alien and Sedition Act being suggested all over again. It has never come as a thought to some that the Chinese in Russia will not develop a separatist agenda. BTW, much of Russia’s fareast was never Chinese. Only a thin strip along the current border.
Divide and conquer. Russia and China enjoy pretty good relations. The brief Sino-Sovet rivalry was the only significantly tense relationship involving Beijing and Moscow/St. Pete based governments.